In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. King wants his audience. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audiences anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr. in his speech, "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, discusses the Vietnam war. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. For example, in paragraph 7, King discusses the harsh reality of the war. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". This comparison is very sobering. This is an attempt to connect with the audiences emotions and prove that the war was imposed on them and even if politicians call it patriotic, society and people would never love war. Dr. King says that the war is draining valuable resources that could be helping the poor in our own country. Welcome to the world of case studies that can bring you high grades! He evaluates the psychological as well as social, political and economic implications of America's participation in Vietnam war. Thank you! The idea of nonviolence is much larger than ordinary people see. These emotionally charged images would seemingly convince anyone that the cause for this war could not possibly be just. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). The author here is using statistics to present the horrifying picture of the Vietnam War. StudyCorgi. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" December 22, 2016 By Richcoca PLATINUM, Canoga Park, California More by this author Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement,. A Time to do What is Right. The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism Public Speech. On April 4, 1967, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 in Riverside Church by delivering a speech titled, "Beyond Vietnam," in the midst of the cruelty of the Vietnam War. Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. However, all wanted clarity on the subject. Ethos, the appeal to the legitimacy and authority of the speaker, is used throughout the speech. This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. In conclusion, Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" speech was a powerful and eloquent call for peace and justice. 4 May. He also reminds the church leaders of something seemingly obvious that they may have lost sight of: the Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless and outcast children (13). His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. Kings main motive was to persuade people to see how war was destroying lives, society and economy and being silent meant being in approval of the war. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence. In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Analyzes the literary device martin luther king jr. uses in his speech is allusions, adding to the importance on how awful the vietnam war was corrupting the united states. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. In order to convince his audience that the civil rights movement in the United States should oppose the Vietnam War, the speaker appealed to their ethos, pathos, and logos. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. He talks about the innocent people killed in the crossfire, mostly children. This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. He tries to make people see the other side of the picture where both black and white men were being pushed into hell without considering and questioning the outcome. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. He states, Many people have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. The war with Vietnam was just as unjust as unnecessary. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence addressing the Vietnam War. King builds an effective argument by using imagery, noting the irony associated with the war, and pointing out the contrast between America before the war and America then. For example, he says that if Americas soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. King uses this metaphor to establish the potentially dreadful consequences of America continuing to fight the war. King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. 804-506-0782 663 Words; writing your own paper, but remember to In front of over 3000 people at the New York Riverside Church King preaches to a room filled with clergy and laymen concerned about the Vietnam. To start, Dr. Kings use of metaphors allows his audience to understand his viewpoint better. His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). 6 Effective Content Marketing Strategies You May Have Overlooked, Market Analysis Definition (With Explanation and Examples). Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech 736 Words3 Pages All they wanted was "to save the soul of America" (King, Beyond, 42). describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/, StudyCorgi. Analyzes how john kerry's "beyond vietnam- a time to break silence" by martin luther king jr. uses rhetorical devices that emphasize the importance and meaning of his speech. He successfully proves that The United States has done far more harm to the Vietnamese than good. (2022, May 4). This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. First of all, King makes his point clear by appealing to the reader's common sense, beliefs and values (logos). new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. He does not want the church leaders to simply listen to his message. Therefore, to remain silent would truly be betrayal. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). In a similar light, King addressed the speech I have a dream to a peaceful mass gathering in Washington asking for change. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. He notes how essential it is to break silence before all hope is lost. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. StudyCorgi. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. He states, repeatedly, To begin, King uses figurative language in the first half of his speech to highlight the destructive nature of the war, strengthening his overall position. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. Furthermore, such a vivid picture will linger permanently in the audiences mind, which will make them think about the terrible outcome in the future. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. He includes various perspectives and addresses several counterarguments with the intention to prove the futility of war as a tool to address social, economic and political problems. In his essay, Dr. King uses the metaphor America has given the Negro people a bad check, which came back marked insufficient funds (46). Dr. King includes a brief, but poignant history of the war in Vietnam which is important because he needs to prove that he knows and understands the politics of the situation. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea.
Switchback Road Design,
Joseph Christopher Lewis Cause Of Death,
Many Opponents Of Abortion Today Are Motivated By,
Nashville Superspeedway Shuttle,
Articles B
