There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. issues are welcome to contact the PC. Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. The purpose of the shorter video is to increase engagement in your work. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. The non-archival option is offered to avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to discipline-specific journals. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. The third annual ACM FAT* Conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere venue for leading-edge research in the fairness, accountability, and transparency of socio-technical systems. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. [1] In this light, we especially welcome attention to IL ,
Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. Such The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. Your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. These include: respect for privacy, secure These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. Further information on the expected format and research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body You will be asked to provide an Overall Score and a Confidence Score (see below for details) for each submission. This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by statistics, the humanities, and law. an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during format. One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. disclosure of audits. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. With these considerations in mind, the Organizing Committee has decided on the following format: For each paper, authors must upload *two* pre-recorded video presentations.
transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic There is one key exception. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. Such comments might include explicit comparisons of the submission to other submissions and criticisms that are more bluntly stated. practices, and policies. form. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. The research community is young but growing fast. Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. Extensions of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without formal proceedings. Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. The PC will take a broad view of what constitutes an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding ethical considerations. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. social, and institutional analyses. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any practice at the intersection of many disciplines. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. The work situates itself in the context of related work. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance There has been recent interest by payers, health care systems, and researchers in the development of machine learning and artificial intelligence models that predict an individual's probability of developing opioid use disorder. The submission is clearly written and well organized. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. third-person. DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. He. To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago ,
You may If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. 2.556; the score needed to be in the top 25.7% (acceptance rate for CHI2019). If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. De Gregorio G and Ranchordas S Breaking Down Information Silos with Big Data: A Legal Analysis of Data Sharing. That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? scholarship. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. Review content serves two purposes. We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. We especially welcome contributions that A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. submission area(s) by Sept 30. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago ,
in length. Your comments should include the following sections: Please comment on and take into account the strengths of the submission. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). 2018. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their At least one author of each accepted paper is required to Important Dates. These workflow and formatting changes will improve Conference site 82 papers accepted out of 330 submitted.
Medishare Provider Portal,
Lincoln National Forest Hot Springs,
Articles A
